A proposal to build a five-building complex called Astoria Cove on the East River waterfront of Astoria is causing some indignation among local residents before construction even begins.
Those who question the project are concerned about an influx of a great many new residents, causing crowded roads, subways and classrooms, and about the prospect of gentrification.
They also point with alarm at the fact that the developer has reduced the number of affordable apartments set aside in its initial proposal. They worry that the change is an indication that the development will eventually leave low-income residents behind.
Alma Realty, the developer, filed an application in March to reduce the number of affordable units to 295 from the 340 previously promised.
The project needs more affordable apartments, not fewer, said Sandra Martins, a real estate broker who has specialized in Astoria for the past four years. “Many residents of Astoria are leaving the area because they can’t afford the expensive rent anymore,” she said. “Two years ago, you could rent a one bedroom apartment in the area for $1300. Now, it’s hard to find for less than $1700. This is a serious issue.”
Others, too, are concerned with the influx of higher buildings charging higher rents. “I am fond of the area but I’m saddened how development has changed the fabric of the neighborhood,” said Colin Olm, a journalist who grew up in the neighborhood and lived close to Astoria Park for nearly 10 years. “Streets that were lined with single and two-family homes are now gone and have been replaced with large “luxury” buildings that are full of small overpriced-apartments. Many long-time residents cannot afford the soaring rents or have to move to a cheaper area,” he continued.To win permission to build higher than the zoning would ordinarily permit, developers must make 20 percent of the apartments affordable, according to city rules. “But of course the interest of the development company is to include as little affordable housing as they can–only enough to get the project approved,” said Marcos Steuernagel, a college professor and resident of Astoria since 2008.
According to Howard Weiss, chair of Davidoff Hutcher & Citron’s, the law firm and lobbyist representing the project’s developer, the complex will bring benefits to Astoria, since it is to be built in an isolated areaoccupied now by old warehouses.
Residents, though, question the location as well as the size of the project.. “I find it interesting that these luxury towers are being build right next to the Astoria housing projects. The juxtaposition between the affluent and those of lesser means will be an interesting story to follow,” said Olm.
In addition to HOW MANY? apartments, the project will include a supermarket, a public school and a waterfront park, open to the public, according to Alam Realty..
According to Donegan Jay, 58, who was born and raised in Astoria, if offering affordable housing was the goal, “individual houses may be a better idea with affordable housing, like the townhouses that were done in Brooklyn.”
When Geraldina Souza comes home from work, she sometimes has to wait more than 20 minutes for the bus to take her to Upper Ditmars. She and other residents of Astoria Park fear the growing population will make matters worse. “The buses don’t run as often as we would like and they stop running around 1 a.m. If a large number of people move here, the trains will be more crowded and lines for the buses that run on Ditmars Boulevard even longer,” Souza said.
But there are those who are showing more positive expectations towards the construction. “I support the project and the renovation of the area,” said Fernanda Coutinho, a designer who lives in Manhattan. “I lived near Astoria Park for two years and because it’s a bit far from the train I never felt really safe. I believe this complex will come with more public transportation, safety and other benefits to the community.”
Steuernagel said that “the important thing is that the population keep the pressure on the politicians, so that the benefits of the development can at least to some extent serve the lower-income population that already lives there, while knowing very well that this is not the intention of the development companies.”
The local community board still has to approve the proposal, which will then head back to City Planning Commission and the City Council for a final decision.